Gather 'round, boys and girls. Today we have a rare treat, a twofer for the Apple Death Knell Counter. I'm combining them into one article because they're related. Writing for The Guardian, Dan Crow gives us Death Knell #61: "We've passed peak Apple: it's all downhill from here." Speaking for ABC News, Bill Weir ran a piece that asked rhetorically, "Has Apple Lost Its Shine?" In that piece, Death Knell #62, Mr. Weir and his reporter also said that Apple has peaked.
Firstly, let me take a time out for pedantry: Mr. Weir, it's not "Apple Computers," it's "Apple Inc." That's been the name of the company for years, and it was never Apple Computers in the first place. We all make mistakes, but come on.
Death Knell #61
On to more serious issues. Let's look at Mr. Crow's piece from The Guardian. It's a well-written essay about Apple by a man with far better credentials than most of the yahoos that are enshrined in the Apple Death Knell Counter, and that's because he worked for Apple.
In fact, he was at Apple when Steve Jobs came back in 1997. He said, "I got to know Steve quite well and Apple really well," and noted that he is an avid Mac user, but prefers Android for his mobile platform.
In his opening comments, Mr. Crow wrote, "The story of Apple Incorporated is far from over. It is the most valuable company in the world, by a large margin. Apple produces a range of exceptional and much loved products. It employs many of the most talented designers and engineers on the planet. But I think Apple has peaked and the story of the next few years will be one of a slow but real decline."
His reasoning is that Apple and its success were built around Steve Jobs, or more generally around having one control freak visionary at the top who made all the decisions. He argues that all of Apple's decision-making apparatus is set up for top-down decisions. Without a product visionary making those decisions, he argued, Apple's ability to innovate and be the badass powerhouse that so many have come to know and love is coming to slow, but inevitable end.
He offers a couple of bullet points as evidence. The Apple Maps rollout, issuing a minor iPad 4 update just seven months after the iPad 3, and a ho-hum iPhone 5 introduction. And on top of that, Apple's executives used a lot of hype to introduce everything since Steve Jobs passed away in 2011, and some of those products were neither all that nor a bag of chips.
He concluded with, "The loss of Steve was devastating - the entire company was built around him and the mistakes we have seen since he left are entirely consistent with a very hierarchical organization trying to find its way without its leader. I think in hindsight, we will see that Apple's peak of creativity, innovation and leadership was early 2012." [Emphasis added]
Those of you who have followed the Apple Death Knell Counter for a long time likely know that I tend to skewer those who issue these predictions of Apple's demise. I'm not doing that for Mr. Crow's piece simply because it's well-reasoned and based on an intimate knowledge of Apple. Most of the chuckleheads in the ADKC don't know what they are talking about.
That said, I do think he's wrong, and for the same reason I've used before. Steve Jobs said the thing he is most proud of creating is Apple, and that he spent the last several years of his life putting into place the things that Apple needed to outlive him, to keep on being awesome.
Accordingly, if you think that Steve Jobs was the bee's knees and a visionary, why wouldn't you trust him when it comes to Apple itself? Mr. Crow's insight is invaluable, but it's based on Apple from 12 years ago, the Apple before Steve Jobs became ill.
The Apple of today is one that was reshaped by a man confronting his own mortality who was all-but obsessed with making sure that Apple's glory wouldn't fade if and when he died. He was such a badass, I am of the opinion that he succeeded in accomplishing that goal.
I also think (rather strongly) that people who poo-poo the iPhone 5, iPad 3/4 or anything else that was released in the last 18 months are simply mis-remembering reality. The iPhone 3G to 3GS? The iPhone 4 to iPhone 4S? The iPad to iPad 2? Each successive generation of iPod?
In fact, iPod in 2001, iPhone in 2007, MacBook Air in 2008. iPad in 2010. Even Apple gets a day of rest or two between major revolutions, and to that effect, Mr. Crow himself said that iPhone 5 is the best smartphone in the market. What more do you want?
This notion that Apple hasn't reinvented the smartphone/tablet/computer market since Steve Jobs died is proof that the company is on the skids isn't based on any kind of reality.
Death Knell #62
Then there's Mr. Weir's piece. It's nothing more than a poorly researched and lightweight TV report that was designed to capitalize on the increased criticism being leveled at Apple.
The teaser on YouTube: "With lukewarm sales for the new iPad Mini and crumbling stock prices, are competitors catching up?"
There's nothing about that sentence that is worthy of ABC news. For starters, iPad mini appears to be doing well. The piece also pointed to small lines for the iPad mini, a point that I have already argued requires that one be really bad at math.
For another, crumbling stock prices have nothing to do with competitors catching up. I personally hate those rhetorical questions used to mask unfounded accusations.
In the piece itself, a narrator opines, "There are deeper concerns. No new products are likely well into next year. Aside from the expectation that Apple may reinvent the television, its products are no longer innovating the way many expect."
OMG! No new products are likely well into next year? That sounds so ominous! Never mind that Apple just refreshed every single product over a 4-week period. Of course there are no new products "expected" until 2013.
I also have another pedantic note: Products don't innovate.
The report includes comments from tech journalists who said that Apple has plateaued, and one who suggested that Samsung's efforts to mock the lines of people at Apple product launches is somehow proof that Apple is on the decline.
I'm not sure how that works.