Apple Hit with Camera Patent Lawsuit

| News

St Clair Intellectual Property Consultants is suing Apple over claims that the Mac and iPhone maker is infringing on patents it owns relating to digital still cameras. The company has a history of patent litigation, according to TG Daily, and Apple looks to be just the next target on the list.

Apple uses still digital cameras in the original iPhone and the iPhone 3G. The iPhone 3GS, iPod nano, and Mac computers all include digital cameras capable of capturing video.

St Clair Intellectual Property Consultants previously sued Sony in 2001 for infringing on the patents and was awarded US$25 million. In 2003, the company sued Canon, Casio, Seiko, Epson, Fuji Photo, Fujifilm, Kyocera, Minolta, Nikon, and Olympus. In 2004, Samsung, Matsushita, Victor, JVC, Nokia, HP and Eastman Kodak were all hit with lawsuits.

By 2006, St Clair Intellectual Property Consultants had slapped Siemens, BenQ, AUdiovox, UT Starcom, Sprint Nextel, Cingular, Verizon, Vodafone and Cellco with patent infringement suits, too. In 2008, RIM and General Imaging were added to the list.

Canon ended up paying the company over $34.7 million, and Fuji and Fujifilm paid over $3 million in damages. Many companies have since licensed the technology from St Clair, too.

Considering St Clair's track record in court so far, Apple may have a hard time sidestepping a big fine in this case.

Sign Up for the Newsletter

Join the TMO Express Daily Newsletter to get the latest Mac headlines in your e-mail every weekday.

6 Comments Leave Your Own

Jeff Gamet

I hate to use the term “patent troll,” but it sure feels like that’s what’s going on here. Of course, they may simply be vigorously defending intellectual property that everyone else it tromping on.

Photodan

Exactly what idea are they suing over? Slapping a camera in almost anything?

Lee Dronick

Exactly what idea are they suing over? Slapping a camera in almost anything?

Certainly not for just including a camera, I don’t think that could be patented. It must be about the camera itself or something associated with it. To bad that the story at TG Daily doesn’t have any more details.

geoduck

Certainly not for just including a camera, I don?t think that could be patented.

Well I’ve seen stuff nearly as bad. : )) Wasn’t there a joke going around for a while that Microsoft was trying to patent the numbers 0 and 1?

But I agree it would be nice to know what they claim their patent covers.

Tim

Sounds like one of those stupid IP patents that get approved by digitally-challenged lawyers, wonder if it really covers anything novel.

Laurie Fleming

Wasn?t there a joke going around for a while that Microsoft was trying to patent the numbers 0 and 1?

Yup - The Onion strikes again: http://www.theonion.com/content/node/29130

Log-in to comment