Particle Debris (wk. ending 7/1) The Dog Ate My Homework

The jury remains out on mobile payments. Right now, it’s a chicken and egg situation, and as Business Insider says, “Consumers will only use a payments service that tons of merchants use. Merchants will only use a payments service that tons of consumers have.” I, for one, am not real excited about Facebook dominating this market, and my hope is that Apple will jump in and do it in the customary Apple way, that is, secure and foolproof.

If you’ve been wondering about Classic apps and the future of Rosetta under OS X Lion, Christopher Breen has written the “Last word on Lion and application compatibility.”

Apple’s NC Data Center, a veritable hotbed of bustle and activity

Photo Credit: Bob Cringely

There has been an enormous amount of curiosity about Apple’s new data center in Maiden, NC. So the inimitable Bob Cringely drove by and took some pictures to get the lay of the land. Here’s his assessment of what he saw, on site. “Have you heard the one about Apple’s data center?” Bob is a pretty astute observer, so his findings are a bit unsettling.

This week TMO wrote about the new TRIM function for factory SSDs installed in Macs. However, Other World Computing found some additional gotchas related to the 10.6.8 update, especially related to the SSD and SATA 2.0 speeds: “10.6.8: The Little Update That Didn’t”

Speaking of Apple hidden gotchas, there has been some discussion about whether Apple is really using a server-grade hard disk in the Time Capsule, as the company advertises. CNET looked into it and found that there is some wriggle room in the definitions and standards. The loose terminology probably helps Apple create a desired perception. Here’s what CNET found: “Does Apple’s Time Capsule really use a ‘server-grade’ hard drive?”

At TMO, we always try to research the latest industry numbers so we can provide the facts and back up our editorial assertions. That means collecting a lot of URLs and organizing them. Here’s one of those researched articles that puts a lot of the iPhone data all in one place, and I know I’ll be referring to it often to get the numbers. So will you. “The iPhone Effect: How Apple’s phone changed everything.”

I mentioned this earlier in the week, but the saga bears repeating because there’s more to report. A senior RIM executive, according to the Boy Genius Report, sent them an open letter describing how he had lost confidence in his company: “Open letter to BlackBerry bosses: Senior RIM exec tells all as company crumbles around him.” The RIM exec didn’t actually use the word “crumble.” — that was an editorial choice of words by BGR. Not long after that story was published, RIM officially responded and tried to put a good face on the whole affair. Here’s the followup story and RIM’s response. “RIM responds to open letter published by BGR.”

Tech theme for the week

The RIM response starts by questioning the authenticity of the letter — which BGR stands behind. The rest of the letter is basically suit-speak and steps around the criticism what was leveled against them. As some observers have suggested, it would have been better if RIM had not responded at all.

Like everyone else, I’ve been following the Final Cut Pro X kerfuffle with Apple and it’s high end video editing customers. What I’ve learned is that everyone is coming at the issue from a different angle, with different needs and perspectives, so the issue seems very confusing. The only way to cut through all that is to understand the Apple politics, and that’s what this former Apple employee, Sachin Agarwal, provides: “Why Apple built Final Cut Pro X.” There’s always a story behind the story.

This was all Apple’s fault. Apple tends to create hype for new products without revealing the technical details about its new product that professionals need. As a result, the default assumption is that the new product is better than the old product. In the case of FCP X, that turned out not to be the case, and Apple has been forced to offer refunds to angry users. Now, Adobe is taking advantage of Apple’s stumble by offering discounts, a Switcher Program, to lure then over to Adobe’s own products.

This is nothing new with Apple. The company cloaks its new products in secrecy and expects customers to buy new products sight unseen, all wound up by the hype. But when it comes to people who make their living with Apple products, Apple needs to be more professional, more transparent. It’s always been a constant problem with Apple, and I wish they’d come to terms with it.

Also, like many others, I was hoping that the Hewlett Packard TouchPad would give Apple some healthy competition. This week, the reviews started rolling in, and it appears that HP made the classic mistake. Instead of starting simple but clean and reliable, and taking its lumps like Apple does, HP decided to shoot for a lot at launch and didn’t nail everything perfectly. The result is that no reviewer was very enthusiastic about the release version, although many expressed high hopes for the future. Here’s a collection of some major reviews:

HP TouchPad

My first reaction to the interview with Richard Kerris (formerly with Apple) is that the HP/Palm positioning is disingenuous. To say that the target isn’t Apple but, rather, is the enterprise sounds good until you realize that the iPad already has significant penetration in the enterprise. The iPad already meets the needs of enterprise users, in spades, so HP’s real job is to explain why the iPad can’t meet the enterprise needs, but the TouchPad can. That will be an interesting challenge, both technically and politically.

I wish you all a safe, happy and rain-free holiday weekend.

[UPDATE: This just in: A humorous look at the organizational charts of some major corporations.]

_______

Photo credits, in order: Bob Cringely, iStockPhoto.com, Hewlett Packard