The iPad 3: The Heat and the Fury

| Particle Debris

Let’s take a look at the “heatgate” drama, and then move on to the standard edition of tech news debris. Why can’t you use FaceTime over LTE? Has Apple exhausted the ways it can make life miserable for Google? And contrary to the conventional wisdom, customers continue to embrace Blu-ray.

__________________

When one analyzes a new product, the basic technical question is: is there a problem that detracts from the performance of this product? Is it an unexpected flaw? Is it a reason not to buy the product?

Flames

For example, if a new car has an overlooked handling problem in specific circumstances that could lead to death or injury, we expect to pass on a purchase until the mistake is corrected. This is symptomatic of incomplete testing. If a baby crib can suffocate a child, we expect to to be pulled from the market, redesigned and made safe

On the other hand, there are laws of physics. We want faster CPUs. We want better graphics in our Macs and iPads. And Mother Nature extracts a toll: more power means more current and more heat. In fact, in general, the power is proportional to the current squared. Is this a design flaw? No. It’s a law of the universe.

Here’s another example. If I’m considering a car purchase, I may use common criteria: handling, cargo space, fuel economy, safety and creature comforts and technology. I expect to drive the car around town at 40 mph and on the Interstate at, perhaps, 70 mph. Now if I take that same car and test drive it on the Utah Salt Flats at 150 mph for 45 minutes, the engine may well overheat. The engine won’t explode or kill me. It just overheats. This is what happens when systems are driven to their limits. Again, I don’t base my purchase decision on the temperature of the car’s engine when driven to extremes.

The upshot of this is that the “heatgate” drama is complete nonsense. You can look it up on Google, but here is a good, sensible, analysis: “iPad 3 ‘Heatgate’ drama is completely overblown.”

The underlying assumption of the extreme views is that when an iPad is driven to extremes of performance, it is unsafe at any speed. That’s pure baloney. For example, I have been told that hot cocoa at Starbucks is served at 130F, far higher than any readings from the iPad 3. And we put that to our lips.

In my own experience, I have been running (and repeating) a 720p movie on my iPad 3 for four hours now. It remains cool to the touch. I don’t generally have time for games, so I haven’t pushed the new iPad in that area. But that’s my point; I’m an average user. So I’m in the camp that says this heatgate is all B.S., designed to spread more heat than light about Apple’s new iPad.

What don’t I like about the new iPad? No stereo speakers. Every other tablet has that, and I think it’s essential. I don’t always have earbuds nearby and handy, nor do I always want to use them. Sometimes, I just want to hold the iPad, all by itself, and hear some good sound. Am I alone in this?

Tech News Debris

According to Ryan Faas, Apple’s FaceTime can only be used on Wi-Fi, despite the LTE speeds available on the new iPads. There are complex reasons for this. First, it could burn up a modest data plan and ruin a relationship with the carrier. It could stress the LTE network in undesired ways. Users tend to pay for the least capable plan to save money, then overlook their usage, and then get surprised. ( That’s never happend, right?) The larger issue is whether the LTE capability is poorly matched to the overall network performance and the data usages that customers might casually expect and want to pay for. Anyway, it’s a something worth monitoring.

Question: how big a risk does Google take by aggravating the largest, most powerful tech company on the planet, Apple? Chris O’Brien ponders what the future may hold if Apple continues to distance itself from Google. And what the risks may be for Google. Moreover, if Apple’ can’t obtain stunning results in the courtroom against Android, might Apple be tempted to damage Google in other ways? It’s all discussed here in: “Will shift to mobile change balance of power between Apple and Google?

How much Apple stock would you need to earn a minimum wage from the dividends? John Brownlee asks that intriguing question at Cult of Mac. The answer is almost a million dollars worth. But, of course, it’s just an interesting thought experiment. If you had a millon dollars in your pocket, you could earn quite a bit more in annual interest. Still, the numbers are fun to play with (and dream about).

One of Murphy’s Laws says that, “Under the most strictly controlled conditions of temperature, pressure and humidity, the organism will do as it damn well pleases.” That certaily seems to be true if the “organism” is the typical Blu-ray enthusiast. According to the Centris Research firm, “About one in four homes had a Blu-ray Disc player or capable consumer electronic device in the fourth quarter of 2011, up 47% from the same period in 2010, according to new research.” If customers are all over Netflix and iTunes and broadband and iPad games, then one would expect a mild decline in these devices. Apparently, there’s a fly in the ointment, and people still enjoy the purchase of rotating plastic.

Blu-ray

I should point out that the very popular Microsoft Xbox still does not have Blu-ray, but the Sony PS3 does. The research report didn’t break down consoles vs. dedicated Blu-ray players. Even so, the message is that customers are still all over the map with their technology focus. Broadband video is not yet a slam-dunk winner.

To my knowledge, no one has yet identified the galaxy used for the Mountain Lion default desktop. I’ll give an honorable mention and maybe even a tchotchke, if I can dig one up, for the first person to identify that galaxy.

[UPDATE: 3/23: 2:11 PM MDT. We have a winner, Paul Duke, who identified that galaxy as NGC 3190 in the Constellation of Leo. Thanks Paul!]

____________

Flames image credit: Shutterstock

Sign Up for the Newsletter

Join the TMO Express Daily Newsletter to get the latest Mac headlines in your e-mail every weekday.

9 Comments Leave Your Own

vasic

According to the same survey, where Blu-ray is now in about 26% of homes, HD cable box (or some other HD subscription delivery service) is in about 40% of homes, while over 60% of homes have a HDTV. If we assume that most of those who have Blu-ray also have the HD cable box, this tells us that one in three of those HDTV households are using their shiny new HDTV to watch stretched-out standard-def programme!

Brutno

John,

RE: stereo speakers in the new iPad. It’s a nice thought, but IIRC, best sound is obtained when the distance to the speakers is the same as the distance between the speakers. Think equilateral triangle. This means listening less than 9.5” from the iPad. Not too comfy.
Also, stereo separation when the speakers are 9.5” apart is poor. You will get stereo sound, but not as good as you’d think, and at a much higher battery drawdown. Better to have a good, single speaker. I witnessed this as a teen when our family car had AM radio with (obviously) just one speaker, but it was HUGE. Great sound, considering the source, but no stereo separation.
Choices, friend, choices. Better sound vs. better battery life. Plus, adding a speaker could take space away from space available for the battery. I’d opt for headphones and better battery life.

geoduck

?About one in four homes had a Blu-ray Disc player or capable consumer electronic device in the fourth quarter of 2011, up 47% from the same period in 2010, according to new research.?

I’m not sure this is as significant as it sounds. I"m in the 75% that does not have a BluRay device. If I’d bought a PC or a TV with a built in disc player or a PS3 I would, but I wouldn’t be using it. What I watch is either not available on Blu-Ray and/or would not benefit from the technology, or is just too expensive. Just because people get a Blu-Ray does not mean they are using it.

Ross Edwards

The reasons otherwise savvy future-looking movie watchers like me still haven’t ditched blu-ray are:

1. Apple TV still isn’t quite there yet, since the ATV3 does not output in 24fps mode.  But the ATV3 is a lot closer than the ATV2 and it’s a great device.  For viewing TV-sourced content, which is 30fps, the ATV3 is now superior to blu-ray.

2. For videophiles, streamed video even done very well isn’t quite up to the same picture quality, and nothing but blu-ray offers DTS 7.1 uncompressed sound right now.  I don’t take things to this extreme but I know many users do.

3. Basic blu-ray players cost less than $50 and are trivial to add to an existing home A/V setup.  No need to buy a bdp with a bunch of web apps on it if you have an Apple TV or other device already feeding that stuff.

4. Online video options still don’t contain all the extras.  Most viewers won’t care movie in and movie out, but for movies we love, we want all the bonus features, documentaries, music videos, deleted scenes, etc.  Apple has started making inroads into this but it’s a scratch on the surface so far, nothing more.

I would love—LOVE—to have nothing attached to my TV set except the ATV3 and soundbar.  But we’re not there yet.

tom_b

“Roadrunner” service gets 3.3 kbits/sec in my ‘hood. Not adequate for downloading movies, in my view.

That said, I’ve contemplated getting an AppleTV and just letting it cache the movie I want to see for a long, long time. But AppleTV, I believe, requires fancy TV inputs—e.g. HDMI. My TV has normal composite and component inputs—no HDMI or DVI—and I don’t expect that to change this decade, as I tend to hang on to TVs a long time.

Gee, I guess I could crowd the family around one of our MacBooks.

Dean Lewis

Sometimes, I just want to hold the iPad, all by itself, and hear some good sound. Am I alone in this?

No. But I think I’m alone in not caring about stereo speakers on tablets. They are crap and do not give good sound. My roommate plays Pandora on his iPad 1 using the tiny tinny stereo speakers, and it drives me up the wall.

John Martellaro

For more on streaming vs. disc use, see:


http://www.tvpredictions.com/discresearch032312.htm

paikinho

When I managed a cafe, we always served our coffee at about 150 degrees. If someone wanted it hotter we would take it to 165-170.

You needed a sleave to hold the cup at that temp.

When I was growing up. Temps would routinely get to 115-118 during July and August where I was living. Hot and uncomfortable, but not overly so.

I think my Hackintosh netbook gets much hotter than 116 when I am playing quake or something. It feels like it will burn you almost.
Grandma’s new iPad 3 gets nowhere near this temp as I am “Testing it Out”
Most of the time there doesn’t really seem to be much temp difference from the iPad2 and I have the Kids iPad2 right next to it for comparison.

Lee Dronick

Well if the new iPad is running hotter it is only because Apple is copying Android tablets.

Log-in to comment