Last month I wrote about an Arizona politician wanting to introduce a porn filter bill. Now Kansas wants to do the same thing, although it sounds like this one won’t attempt to fund the border wall.
« It’s to protect children, » Garber, a Republican, said in an interview. « What it would do is any X-rated pornography stuff would be filtered. It would be on all purchases going forward. Why wouldn’t anybody like this? »
Why indeed. Because you guys don’t seem to care about children outside of the womb.
Check It Out: Now Kansas Introduced a Porn Filter Bill
From the article:
« Why wouldn’t anybody like this?”
‘…Because you guys don’t seem to care about children outside of the womb. »
==
Hmm. I wouldn’t mind hearing the rest of this argument. How others ‘seem’ to care about children outside the womb affects whether or not a bill to protect children is liked? Why would someone let what others ‘seem’ to care about affect their attitude?
Good luck with that.