Appleis MobileME service lacks Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) encryption for e-mail, and that could allow others to see the data that a MobileMe user sends, according to Computerworld on Wednesday. While true, thatis only part of the story, and a calmer, more technical viewpoint has been provided by Tidbits.
Nancy Gohring at Computerworld cited a source at Macrumors who stated that the lack of SSL encryption is a deal breaker. The author went on to site several others who had an opinion about the issue:
"MobileMe is suppose to be Microsoft Exchange for the rest of us. But Microsoft Exchange does things in a secure manner," said another blogger writing under the name of James Katt. "As it is, if you run a business using your Mac, then you cannot use MobileMe because it transmits data insecurely."
Digger deeper into such issues, however, is always a good practice, and Rich Mogull at Tidbits on Wednesday provided deeper background and an enlightening technical perspective.
Mr. Mogull called that Star Trek technobabble and pointed out that that just means that there is authentication, and the password itself is encrypted.
The Tidbits article also pointed out that most e-mail is sent in the clear anyway, and MobileMe is no different. In addition, the other services are encrypted. [Getting into even deeper detail, the Tidbitis author found that there is a very subtle flaw in Appleis handling of certificates, due a domain name change. However, it would be hard to exploit.]
"When you set up your MobileMe email account, it defaults to a secure connection, and in testing iCal, I found both the push and manual synchronization process appears to use SSL." Mr. Mogull wrote. "Using a sniffer on my own system, I was unable to access the contents of any synchronizing calendar entries or email. iChat authentication is also secure, and MobileMe installs digital certificates to enable secure chats with other iChat users - unlike AOL Instant Messenger ..."
The author did contend that there would, in fact, be very little overhead if Apple were to more broadly utilize SSL, and he would prefer that, especially since users pay US$99/yr for the service. In the meantime, those who want to learn more about their MobileMe operations will find the Tidbits article much deeper and more informative than the less technical approach at other sites.