A User's Joyful Reaction to Apple's Late 2013 21.5-inch iMac

Apple's "late 2013" 21.5-inch Haswell powered iMac is compact, fast and runs very, very cool. I just received one, and I was very impressed. Here are my observations.


First, this is not a review. The best review I have seen of this iMac is by Anand Lal Shimpi: "21.5-inch iMac (Late 2013) Review: Iris Pro Driving an Accurate Display." It's simply an awesome review, as are all those by AnandTech.

If this Mac has been on your shopping list, read the review. Then you'll want one. Straight away.

So did I.

In my case, an aging 2010 27-inch iMac and a hardware failure led me to an earlier than planned decision to move to a 21.5-inch late 2013 model iMac. I opted for the Core i7, as always, with discrete graphics, 16 GB of RAM, and (for me) the essential 256 GB SSD.

I was, at first, concerned that the smaller display of 21.5 inches at 1920 x 1080 might be a little cramped compared to my older 27-inch iMac (2560 by 1440), and it is. But I only expect to be using this iMac for a short period and then move on to the late 2013 Mac Pro. By and large, the display is a little less real estate than I'm used to, but everything I do there: Firefox, YoruFukurou (Twitter), ImageWell and PathFinder all still fit.

The first thing I noticed was that this Mac has a very clean and tight design. While the edges of the 2010 iMac were large and boxy, this smaller iMac, with its thin edges, just feels sexier. It makes the old, thick 2010 iMac look dated.

Of course, like everyone else, I read the stories about how a thin edge isn't really important because we view straight on. Plus, in the back where the guts are, it's thicker. I no longer subscribe to any of that now. When not writing, I get to view the iMac from many angles. As a reviewer, I'm constantly fussing with the iMac, adjusting its position, working with items on my desk, etc. I'm delighted with this iMac's design as I handle it.

Look Ma, No Heat

The next thing I noticed is that this Mac runs incredibly cool. It's been on constantly for several days, and it remains cool to the touch. While the 2010 iMac has a long slot at the top to let heat escape, this new iMac has a small grill on the back just above the power plug. There is no noticeable heat coming out of there in my normal operations. (I haven't done any stress testing yet.)

That 2010 iMac, in normal use would run so hot that I had to install smcFanControl and occasionally crank up the fans when my office got warm. I don't think I'll need it on this new iMac.

In fact, this Mac so far has been perfectly silent. I'll be amused to hear what the fan(s) sound like if they ever do come on. I'm loving low-power, fast desktop iMacs.

When I set this iMac up out of the box, I used a Time Machine backup that was saved to a Synology DS412+ NAS/RAID system. It took far less than an hour to load 120 GB via gigabit Ethernet. The process was fast and flawless, and I was delighted to see my new iMac identical in every operational aspect as the day before when using the old iMac.

As an aside, the Time Machine archive, as is standard practice, did not include my Parallels virtual machine (.pvm) files. Those should be and were excluded from Time Machine and were archived and reloaded separately, this time to an external USB 3 drive from Other World Computing.

Left: 23-inch Apple Cinema Display (DVI > Displayport connector.)
RIght; 21.5-inch Late 2013 iMac.


With 16 GB of RAM and an Intel "Haswell" processor that's several generations newer than the "Lynnfield," it's delightful to have a palpable feel to the increased speed. The old iMac was nice, but things snap on the display even faster now. Contrary to a peculiar, divergent line of reasoning, you can never have a computer that's too fast. Never. (Too expensive? Maybe.)

For the curious, Geekbench benchmarks are available at PrimateLabs. In 64-bit, Single Core mode, this particular i7 iMac comes in at 3868. Compare that to my trusty but old 2009 Mac Pro at 2315.


I haven't burned a CD/DVD in years, and I agree that this technology is dead. Losing that drive makes all the difference when it comes to allowing a beautiful industrial design. However, for the sake of being able to still read some DVDs, including an emergency boot DVD from ProSoft (Drive Genius), I'm planning to buy an external SuperDrive from Apple. It's only US$79, and I'm guessing I may never need to use it. Still, it's nice to have handy for the day, coming soon, when no Mac in the house has a built-in SuperDrive.

Concluding Remarks

Macs have a reputation for lasting a long time. My average time to hold a Mac is four to five years. One can become accustomed to an old friend while technology marches on, and I submit that it's a good thing to seriously think about a new Mac after four years. It's not because the Mac becomes non-functional. Rather, it's because it's just good sense to keep up with technology before it's too late. One loses touch with what's new and risks unrecoverable hardware failure as well.

My wife will get the (fixed) 2010 iMac as a hand-me-down, then we'll recycle her old Mac to Apple and get some cash. We'll use Apple's "Reuse and Recycling Program."

This awesome new Mac came with a joyful reminder: it's good to move on to Apple's latest and flow with the technology, design and speed of new Macs. It's been a delightful experience so far.


iMac teaser image via Apple.