iPad 2: Faster, Lighter & Thinner

| In-Depth Review

Apple’s new iPad 2 is finally in customer’s hands, and based on the company’s PR machine, it’s the best thing to hit the tech world ever. After cutting through the PR, is Apple’s second generation multimedia tablet really worth the upgrade? Read on and find out.

The iPad 2 is Apple’s second take on what a tablet computer device should be. Like the original, it sports a 9.7-inch multi-touch display, built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth support, a built-in microphone, offers a ten hour battery life, comes in 16GB, 32GB and 64GB capacities, runs iOS and is compatible with Apple’s App Store. Keeping with tradition, the new models cost the same as their first generation brothers, but add new features.

iPad 2Apple’s new iPad 2 in black or white

iPad 2 is about a third thinner than the original model, is slightly narrower and shorter, and weighs in at about two tenths of a pound less. The tablet’s tapered edges make it more comfortable to hold, and its flatter back means it’s more stable when laying flat on a table.

The new model also includes front and rear-facing digital cameras, a built-in gyroscope, GSM and CDMA-compatible 3G wireless versions (think AT&T and Verizon), faster graphics, a dual-core Apple-designed A5 processor running at 1GHz, and white or black bezel options — yes, unlike the iPhone 4, Apple is actually shipping a white version of the iPad 2.

Under the Hood

The iPad 2 sports a dual-core A5 processor and includes 512MB RAM. In comparison, the original iPad shipped with a single-core A4 processor running at 1GHz and includes only 256MB RAM.

The extra horsepower and memory should gives apps a little more breathing room, and makes Apple’s interpretation of multitasking a little faster. The iPad 2 feels a little snappier overall, and some Apple apps, such as Mobile Safari and Mail, seem noticeably faster when you first start playing with the tablet.

To be fair, Mobile Safari gained a hefty speed boost with the release of iOS 4.3. The update included a new JavaScript engine that offers a nice improvement in Web site performance. If you’re running an original iPad, or an iPhone 4, iPhone 3GS, or fourth generation iPod touch you’ll see performance improvements in Mobile Safari after installing iOS 4.3, too.

After a few days of using the iPad 2 while leaving my trusty first gen iPad collecting dust on my desk, I picked up the old model and took it for a spin again. That’s when I realized just how dramatic the performance differences between the two generations really are.

Launch times for apps where quicker on the iPad 2, jumping between apps was noticeably faster, and those little lags I grew accustomed to over the past year were gone. Even turning off and on the new model was substantially faster.

Everything felt more fluid and smoother. As Steve Jobs says, “Like butter.”

Even with the noticeable performance improvements, I’m betting we’ll see even more speed boosts out of the iPad 2 over the next few months as developers find ways to tweak their apps to take advantage of that A5 processor, and as Apple releases new system updates that run faster and more efficiently.

The iPad 2 includes new graphics hardware that Apple claims is nine times more powerful than what was offered in the original iPad. The 9.7-inch multi-touch display didn’t change with the second gen model, although it does seem brighter and colors feel a touch warmer, too, which tells me iPad 2 has a slight yellow shift compared to the first generation’s slight blue shift.

Text seems to render a little more sharply on the iPad 2, which is nice, but the new graphics horse power really shows in games that have been optimized to take advantage of the new hardware.

The popular fantasy fighter game Infinity Blade is a great example of what the new graphics hardware is capable of. While the graphics look great on the original iPad, they look positively fantastic on the iPad 2. Shapes are smoother, lighting looks more natural, and characters that appeared as if they were rendered on a nice gaming console now look more like they were rendered for an animated movie.

Infinity Blade, iPad 1Infinity Blade on the original iPad looks nice…

Infinity Blade, iPad 2…but looks much better on the iPad 2.

Beefed up graphics support also comes with another bonus: The iPad 2 can mirror to external displays and projectors, just like the Mac. Apple offers two video adapters for the iPad’s dock port, now, designed to take advantage of the tablet’s video-out features.

The Dock to VGA adapter that Apple introduced with the original iPad is still available and works great for mirroring the tablet’s display during presentations, demos and classes. The new Dock to HDMI adapter, however, offers substantially higher resolution output, and can play out copy protected movies, too. It also includes a Dock port so you can charge your iPad while watching movies.

Both video adapters work seamlessly, and the video mirroring feature is reason enough for people that demo or train from their iPad to upgrade to the new model.

Apple claims the iPad 2 gets about ten hours of battery life, and based on my tests, that sounds just about right. Under normal usage — which includes Web surfing, online research, lots of email, too much time in Twitter and Angry Birds, and video watching — I went from a full charge to 10 percent over four full days on 32GB Wi-Fi-only model. I was able to blast through most of a charge over two days with heavy video, music and gaming.

My rough estimates show I managed at least ten hours on a charge with normal use, and dropped down to about six hours of heavy use. That falls in line with Apple’s advertised specs, and tells me I won’t have to worry about my battery through out the day when I’m using my iPad at conferences and expos.

Video and Photos on the Go

Apple was finally able to stop the never ending “Why doesn’t it have a camera?” questions that started the day the original iPad was introduced. The iPad 2 includes two cameras, a front-facing camera for FaceTime video chats, and a rear-facing camera capable of capturing 720p video.

Unfortunately, Apple has a new question to deal with — at least until the iPad 3 is announced — because both cameras are, quite frankly, crap. The front facing camera is VGA-quality, meaning it offers only 640x480 resolution, and doesn’t perform well unless the lighting conditions are near perfect.

The front-facing camera is adequate for FaceTime video chats, but adequate seems not good enough with the new MacBook Pros sporting FaceTime HD cameras and widescreen video chat support. Since FaceTime on the iPad, iPhone and iPod touch is limited to Wi-Fi connections, 3G wireless bandwidth can’t be a concern, so I’m left wondering why Apple chose to go with “just acceptable” for its iPad FaceTime Camera.

iPad and iPhone photo comparisonActual size photo comparison: iPad (left), iPhone 4 (right),

both pics taken from the same distance from object

Even with the VGA camera, however, FaceTime is easy to use on the iPad, and as long as you have good lighting the image quality is fine. Holding an iPad to video chat feels cumbersome, so don’t plan on holding one in front of your face for extended calls even with the weight Apple shaved off the tablet body. This is one place a stand will be handy, or just use your iPhone for FaceTime chats instead.

Where the front-facing camera is mostly “meh,” the rear-facing camera is “what the frak?” Sure, it captures 720p video, but its photos are lower resolution than the original iPhone camera, and the image quality is down right disappointing without the best of lighting conditions. Photos are grainy and full of noise, they aren’t sharp, and the color quality is just OK.

Holding the iPad 2 to capture photos or video makes it very clear Apple didn’t intend for people to use their tablet as a point-and-shoot digital camera replacement. It’s awkward, and the camera button placement is practically out of reach unless you have exceptionally long fingers.

Despite my extended rant, I can see where the rear-facing camera could turn out to be really handy for augmented reality apps, capturing barcodes for warehouse inventory tracking, realtors logging properties, and other out-of-the-office tasks that need quick photos for tracking purposes.

Going Skin Deep

The iPad 2 is a testament to beautiful industrial design. The sleek lines and curves attract your eye, and look smart and professional without compromising on comfort in your hand.

Those aesthetics, however, come at a small price. While the tapered edges do make the tablet more comfortable to hold, they also make the ports and side controls just a little more difficult to access.

iPad 2 dockport. It looks flimsy, kids!The new iPad’s dock port leave plenty of connector exposed

The Dock port, for example doesn’t have a flush face, so it can be hard to get the dock cable in and properly seated. Once the cable is connected it seems firmly attached, but looks like it is exposed to accidental breaking if you aren’t careful. Since the iPad 2 hasn’t been available for even a month yet, it’s hard to say if the new Dock port simply looks a little flimsy, or if there will be real issues with users breaking the connector.

The headphone jack is on a curved surface, too, as are the volume rocker and mute/rotation lock switch. Cables seated in the headphone jack port feel stable and sturdy even though the base of the connector isn’t sitting flush against the iPad body. Reaching the volume rocker and mute/rotation lock switch takes some getting used to since they feel more like they are back behind the glass instead of off the side of the tablet.

I found the mute/rotation lock switch to be the most difficult control to reach, and I usually end up turning my iPad on its side so I can get at it. If you expect to adjust your iPad’s volume often, or use the mute/rotation lock switch regularly, be ready to spend some time learning where they sit because they aren’t easy to hit thanks to that tapered edge.

iPad 2 switchesPower, volume and mute/rotation switches hide on a tapered edge

Like the original iPad, the iPad 2 includes a single built-in speaker off to the side of the dock port. The audio quality isn’t anything spectacular, but it is good enough for alerts, most game sounds, quick YouTube videos and a little casual music listening. If you’re expecting high fidelity audio out of this speaker, you’re asking for too much because it isn’t a replacement for headphones or external speakers.

The speaker’s audio seems to aim away from the iPad 2’s back, which makes it appear like the speaker is louder when there’s a flat surface behind it. If you use your iPad on desks and tables — especially with a case that holds the tablet at an angle — the sound bounces back at you so you don’t have to crank up the volume quite as loud if you aren’t using headphones.

Smart Cover

Apple’s Smart Cover doesn’t ship with the iPad 2, and I wish it did. It’s an accessory that truly enhances the device and shows just how much attention the company pays to the little details.

The Smart Cover attaches to the iPad with magnets that are arranged to make it really difficult to put the cover in the wrong place. The magnets are strong enough that the cover shouldn’t pop off accidentally, and it even puts your iPad to sleep when it’s covering the display. Open the cover, and your iPad automatically wakes up.

The Smart Cover is available in leather (US $69) or polyurethane ($39), with five unique colors for each material. The leather covers have a professional look, but not too stuffy. The polyurethane covers look more casual, but don’t slip into seeming cheap or like toys.

iPad 2 Smart CoverThe leather iPad 2 Smart Cover

I carried my Smart Cover-clad iPad in a bag that wasn’t designed specifically to hold a tablet for over a week and never had any surprises with the cover popping off. It looks sharp, and it’s available in several colors so there’s a good chance you’ll find one that fits your style. Since it’s easy to attach or remove, I’m betting Apple is hoping customers will buy more than one just so they can swap out colors depending on what they’re wearing or the activities they’re involved in.

Apple designed the cover as a series of panels with flex points so it lays flat when you need it to, and folds into a stand that positions the display at a comfortable angle for on-screen typing, or upright like a digital photo frame. Unlike Apple’s first attempt at an iPad case, the Smart Case is stable in either position.

How stable, you ask? Where the original iPad case bounced a little when you typed with the on-screen keyboard, the Smart Cover is rock solid. I tend to type fairly aggressively on my iPad screen — so much so that people can hear the thumping sound as my fingers smack the screen — and there wasn’t any movement. It was as if my iPad had become a solid angled slab.

I noticed an immediate improvement in my typing speed and a dramatic reduction in my typing errors thanks to the Smart Cover because my iPad wasn’t bouncing as my fingers hit the screen.

Smart Cover as a standThe Smart Cover works great as a typing and viewing stand

The angle the Smart Cover holds your iPad at is a little shallower and far more comfortable than the angle Apple’s first gen iPad case uses. That may not be a big deal for some people, but anyone that spends serious time typing with the on-screen keyboard with be very happy with the new angle.

Using Smart Cover to turn my iPad into a photo frame stand was another pleasant surprise. Unlike the first gen iPad case, the Smart Cover actually works as a photo frame stand. The case is stable, the screen position is nice, and the Smart Cover looks like it was designed to actually support your iPad instead of looking like someone bent their case backwards in hopes that it would work as a stand.

It’s clear Apple spent a long time working on the Smart Case. In fact, based on many of the tablets I saw at CES this year, I’ll go so far as to say I think Apple put more thought into this cover than most of their competitors did on their tablets.

The Smart Cover surface that touches your iPad display is a microfiber material Apple says will help keep the display finger print and smudge-free. Turns out Apple was right: it really does help keep your display clean.

Unfortunately, the flex points between the cover panel sections don’t touch the iPad screen, so you get clean swaths of display broken up by stripes of finger print smudges. The smudge stripes aren’t too noticeable in lower light conditions, but bright light really shows them off.

Smart Cover with smudgesThe Smart Cover cleans your screen. Well, mostly.

With all those magnets tucked away in the Smart Cover, along with the magnets inside the iPad 2 that help hold the cover in place, I got concerned about the potential for data loss issues with hard drives that get too close.

I checked with the experts at Other World Computing to find out if iPad 2 owners need to take steps to avoid accidental data loss at the hands of their Smart Covers. In a nutshell, the answer is “no.”

The magnets in the iPad 2 and the Smart Cover pose “no risk to flash, and nearly no risk to traditional hard drives,” OWC’s Grant Dahlke said. He added that a magnetic field strong enough to damage your hard drive “would suck the iron out of your blood.”

Considering the health hazards losing the iron in your blood would cause, I’m assuming most people would have bigger concerns than lost data if they were in that situation.

My disappointment with the Smart Cover is that there aren’t magnets to hold it flat against the back of the iPad. You can fold the cover around to cover the back, so it seemed like a natural design feature to include a way to keep it from flopping around.

The cover also obscures the rear-facing camera when it’s flat against the back of the iPad 2. You can fold the cover in half and the built-in magnets will hold that shape so the camera isn’t blocked, but I’m thinking that Apple’s decision to let the Smart Cover block the camera says a lot about what the company thinks of the cameras it used.

Did I mention that I’m not impressed with the iPad 2 cameras?

GarageBand and iMovie to Go

If there was any doubt about the iPad’s ability to handle content creation instead of just content consumption, Apple made that clear with the mobile versions of Keynote, Pages and Numbers. The company really drove that point home with the introduction of GarageBand and iMovie for the iPad.

Just as it does on the Mac, GarageBand for the iPad let’s you mix your own music with real and in-app instruments, offers offers editing tools, and can export your finished songs. It supports up to eight tracks in a file, and includes smart instruments that can turn nearly anyone into a musician even if they can’t keep a beat or carry a tune.

GarageBand for the iPadGarageBand for the iPad

iMovie for the iPad is an update for iMovie for the iPhone. It supports video and basic audio editing, includes transitions and other effects, and offers several templates designed to help make your movies look more professional even if you aren’t a designer or film editor by trade.

Both apps do a fantastic job of showing off what the iPad 2 is capable of, and most likely will do at least as much to help sell the tablet as Apple’s ad campaign. Seeing these apps in action shows just how empowering the iPad can be as a creative tool without requiring users to spends weeks reading manuals to learn the built-in features.

There’s plenty more to say about both apps, so be sure to watch for TMO’s GarageBand and iMovie app reviews. They’re coming soon.

The Bottom Line

Apple has done a great job of taking what was already a compelling product and making it even more enticing in its second generation version. If you skipped the original iPad, the iPad 2 is a great place to get in on the tablet action. If you already have an iPad, the second generation model is a nice upgrade, but if what you have still meets your needs it isn’t necessarily a must-have purchase.

The lighter weight and tapered body make the iPad 2 more comfortable to hold and even better looking than the original. The better performance and graphics are welcome, especially if you found the first gen model to be a little too sluggish, or if you play games that take advantage of the improved graphics horsepower.

Video mirroring support makes the iPad 2 a must-have upgrade for teachers and presenters, and support for VGA along with HDMI connections is a nice bonus.

Don’t expect to take prize winning photos with the iPad 2’s built-in cameras. They’re adequate at best, but they’ll do the job to help FaceTime video chatting gain more traction.

The iPad 2 is a welcome upgrade, and feels like the iPad everyone wanted when the first model shipped only a year ago. The fact that Apple was able to shave a couple ounces off the weight, trim the thickness down by a third, beef up the performance and maintain a ten hour battery life is the icing on the cake.

Product: iPad 2

Company: Apple

List Price: $499 - $829

Pros:

Better performance and graphics, thinner, more comfortable to hold, video mirroring.

Cons:

Poor camera quality, tapered edges make ports and buttons difficult to use.

Sign Up for the Newsletter

Join the TMO Express Daily Newsletter to get the latest Mac headlines in your e-mail every weekday.

Comments

gslusher

Nice review.

It seems obvious to e that Apple did not intend the iPad cameras to be used for photos. It may be primarily for FaceTime and maybe the “enhanced reality” apps—e.g., those that use GPS to tell where the camera is pointing and indicate landmarks, businesses, etc. As Andy Ihnatko said, using a tablet as a camera is like taking photos with a reflective lunch tray. I take a fair number of photos—17,000+ last year, over 9,000 so far this year (I expect to take well over 20,000), and I find using even a cellphone camera to be a terrible experience. (The quality of most cellphone camera photos proves this. It’s POSSIBLE to take nice photos, but not the way most people do—e.g., at arm’s length.)

As for the dock connector, it’s possible that some enterprising company will come up with a small bit of plastic that fits on the underside of the connector and supports it against the iPad’s body. (I’ve had the same concern about my third-generation iPod Nano.)

Lee Dronick

For the most part I really like my iPad 2. I have a couple of complaints

1. The cameras are a giant step backwards.

2. I could use a bigger margin, my thumbs can trigger an event. Eventually I will learn to hold it so that it doesn’t happen, but for now it can be frustrating.

3. I have a Smart Cover and it sometimes pops off, usually when I fold it back flat and then hold the iPad in may hands. I find the back is slick so I like the texture of the cover, I guess I could put something on the back like a felt skin. Maybe the magnets could be stronger, but that could bring more problems.

4. The App Store can be difficult to browse. Perhaps more categories and/or subcategories.

Otherwise she is fitting in like a new a puppy.

eolake

Nice review, and I think those are good evaluations.

I am in doubt about the covers though, they seem kinda silly and pointless. They don’t really protect the device, and the dubious stand-function has only one angle. So what good do they really do? (Especially at those prices.)

I would have liked a higher-res screen (a lot), but I’m getting the iPad2 anyway for the better handling and performance. I’m still hoping though for a “super iPad” like rumors have hinted will come. Trying to read comics on this screen is frustrating.

Lee Dronick

I am in doubt about the covers though, they seem kinda silly and pointless. They don?t really protect the device, and the dubious stand-function has only one angle. So what good do they really do? (Especially at those prices.)

Well two angles, one more suited to typing and one more towards viewing video. But yeah when it comes to say FaceTime it is harder to adjust for a good view.

I think the Smart Cover does protect the iPad. Not so much as some other 3rd party products, not that there any iPad 2 specific ones on the shelves. Remember though it is a cover not a case. To me the bare iPad 2 feels slick and the Smart Cover gives it some texture when moving it around.

Cost, yeah it is a bit steep and I bought a red leather one. Hopefully it will last a long time.

other side

Otherwise she is fitting in like a new a puppy.

She whines a lot and piddles on the floor? wink

Seriously, the “good enough” cameras and eerily-flimsy dock port connector are things I expect from Dell.  Hopefully there’s a 2.5 update in the works, and this isn’t indicative of a new direction at Apple.

Lee Dronick

Sir Harry Flashman said:Otherwise she is fitting in like a new a puppy.
She whines a lot and piddles on the floor?

She is not without her “accidents”, but what I meant is that she is winning my heart. smile

wab95

so I?m left wondering why Apple chose to go with ?just acceptable? for its iPad FaceTime Camera

1) Cost

2) Insufficiently competitive offerings from the competition to make the camera (or other hardware) investment cost-effective or essential

wab95

Considering the health hazards losing the iron in your blood would cause, I?m assuming most people would have bigger concerns that lost data if they were in that situation

Oh, yes…from a clinical perspective, concur with your assessment of priorities.

NEALC5

Apple doesnothing unintentionally.  They purposely put a lower resolution camera, so that people DO NOT use it as a camera.  It is a difficult to use camera, and even if it had 10 megapixels, I wouldn’t use it. Nearly every phone has a camera, nearly everyone who buys a iPad or competing tablet has a digital point and shoot or a cell phone camera.  Why in the hell would you want to use an iPad as a camera? So Apple did it to save money and power.  Why put something in that I bet 99% of people won’t use. 

Before the iPad 2 came out, I was betting that they wouldn’t even bother to put in a rear facing camera.  But they did, and they did it for specific use cases.

Apple is training us NOT to use a tablet as a camera.  The rear camera is for utilitarian uses…videoing real estate, snapping photos for import to a database, scanning bar codes, scanning personal checks, custom applications, etc. It is NOT intended for normal photography. 

At this time next year, I want journalists to interview people who own any 10” tablet to tell them how they use their cameras.  Maybe the 7” tablets have a better use for a rear-camera, since it is easier to hold in one hand, but I bet most people don’t use that camera at all.

Lee Dronick

@NEALC5

Even for FaceTime use it seems a substandard camera. However, I have had bad video and good video during chats between Mac users. I attribute the poor video to slow networks so maybe it is good enough that purpose.

Yes, it is hard device to hold for photography and there is no depth of field adjustments and such. Even still I going to take my iPad out an about and see what I can do in the way of just working with composition and lighting angles.

Can one of the readers here who are knowledgable about camera component pricing give us an idea of the cost difference between say this iPad camera and the ones in an iPhone or even a Mac?

El Mutanto

I’m surprised that so many reviewers worry about the dock’s apparent weak connection because the enclosure is slanted… but it’s the exact same thing with the iPod touch… doesn’t anyone own or have reviewed the 4th gen iPod touch?

I own one and yes it was tricky to attach it to the connector for the first three goes but now it’s second nature. It’s also very sturdy and it’s never come off unintentionally.

So, if there was no problem with the way the iPod touch connects to the cable, why such a worry about the iPad 2’s?

other side

Apple is training us NOT to use a tablet as a camera.  The rear camera is for utilitarian uses?videoing real estate, snapping photos for import to a database, scanning bar codes, scanning personal checks, custom applications, etc. It is NOT intended for normal photography.

Maybe so.  But I still expect a 2011 device to be above 1996 standards.

As you said, Apple does nothing unintentionally.  Which means the iPad 3 gets HD cameras, a reinforced dock connector, and no screen bleed.  Apple knows we’ll be lining up to buy that too, along with whatever built-in obsolescence Apple includes to keep the cycle going.

geoduck

Played with an iPad2 at BestBuy last weekend. I found the cameras to be adequate. Sure they can’t match the image quality of my 10MP Canon but when I e-mail a picture to a friend I have to reduce the image to ~200kb. At that point they are about the same resolution as those from an iPad2 or iPod Touch. If I want a fantastic picture I’ll pull out the SX10. For a quick snap by e-mail or Skype I think the camera in the iPad or iPod Touch will do. At least they aren’t so terrible as to make me wait for the iPad3 or even the iPod Touch in September,.

Stubones

And no one mentioned lack of a camera flash? We’re so happy that Apple graced us with a new version to gloss over the obvious lack of a camera. they had to hold back some features for iPad 3 I suppose.

I find the ipad1 easier to hold than the ipad2.

Using either camera for barcode applications in a warehouse environment is unrealistic since they would need light to get it to read reliably, plus it’s not tough enough for warehouse life unless protected with an otterbox.

Log-in to comment