John Ternus is spending far more time in Apple’s design studio than Tim Cook

Aerial view of Apple Park in Cupertino
Apple Park in Cupertino. Image: Apple

John Ternus is reportedly spending several days each week inside Apple’s design studio, sometimes visiting more than once in a single day. That level of involvement marks a clear change from Tim Cook’s leadership style and shows where the new CEO believes he can contribute most directly.

Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman reports that Cook generally visited the studio for about an hour once a month at most. Ternus has instead immersed himself in both industrial design and human interface work, giving designers regular access to the person who makes Apple’s final corporate decisions.

The difference reflects each executive’s professional background. Cook built his career around operations and supply-chain management, while Ternus rose through Apple as a hardware engineer. Regular studio time allows the new CEO to review ideas earlier, understand tradeoffs and settle disagreements before they slow a product program.

Don’t miss the best of The Mac Observer

Set us as a preferred source and our Apple reporting ranks higher in your Google Search results and Discover feed — one tap, no account changes.

Or get it by email

A more direct product review process

Frequent visits can shorten the path between a designer’s proposal and an executive decision. They also make it easier to coordinate a device’s physical controls, materials and dimensions with the software interface that appears on its screen.

The approach recalls the direct attention Steve Jobs gave Apple’s design organization, although Ternus comes from engineering rather than a traditional design discipline. Close involvement does not guarantee stronger products, because teams still need room to challenge the CEO and test ideas without every early concept becoming a commitment.

Apple’s broader push for faster product development gives those studio visits additional importance. If Ternus wants fewer delays and shorter decision chains, spending time where hardware and software ideas first take shape may be more useful than reviewing finished proposals from a distance.

Discussion

Join the discussionCommenting as a guest — your email is never published · Log in

Protected by Akismet — be kind, stay on topic.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.