New court filings in The New York Times’ copyright case against OpenAI and Microsoft show employees at both companies discussing the possibility that generative AI could damage the web content their systems depend on. The documents were made public in the publishers’ lawsuit, which challenges the use of news articles to train and operate AI products.
One internal Microsoft discussion described a potential “doom loop”: AI systems surface answers instead of sending people to original sites, publishers lose traffic and revenue, and the quality of the open web declines. That concern is not a court finding that either company broke the law. It is evidence cited by The Times in support of its copyright claims.
Why the documents matter
- They show internal debate over AI’s effect on publishers and training data.
- They are part of an active copyright lawsuit, not a final ruling.
- OpenAI and Microsoft dispute The Times’ legal claims.
The core dispute is whether training and responding with AI tools unlawfully copies protected journalism, or whether the use is transformative. The Times argues that AI answers can substitute for the work publishers produce. OpenAI and Microsoft have said their systems use material in ways permitted by copyright law and do not simply republish articles.
Don’t miss the best of The Mac Observer
Set us as a preferred source and our Apple reporting ranks higher in your Google Search results and Discover feed — one tap, no account changes.
Internal language can be important in litigation, but readers should not mistake a staff debate for a company-wide admission or a legal conclusion. The case will turn on the court’s assessment of the evidence and copyright law, not on one phrase alone.
The New York Times reported on the newly unsealed material and the parties’ positions.
Discussion