The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
Apple Faces iPod, iTunes Patent Suits

Apple Faces iPod, iTunes Patent Suits

by , 7:35 AM EST, March 7th, 2005

Two separate companies have filed patent lawsuits against Apple Computer alledging the company has violated their patents related to the iPod digital music device and the iTunes Music Store (iTMS).

Chicago-based Advanced Audio Devices LLC has sued Apple claiming the iPod violates one of its patents for a "music jukebox."

The company's patent, filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in August of 2000 and granted in July of 2003, describes a music "jukebox" for storing a "music library".

"The music jukebox includes a housing, audio input structure on the housing for receiving audio signals, audio output structure on the housing for outputting audio signals, and a data storage structure in the housing for storing audio signals," the filing said.

The Chicago Tribune reported Friday the company tried to settle with Apple in December over its claim. Apple "ignored its attempt to seek a business resolution," the complaint states.

Advanced Audio Devices LLC was founded in 1997 by Peter J. Keller.

In addition, Hong Kong-based Pat-rights has also filed suit against Apple claiming its digital rights management technology violates its patent that was granted in December of 2003.

Pat-rights patent describes a method of "protecting publicly distributed software from unauthorized use" using a sub-program for encryption, a sub-program "for authorizing (the) use of a software product," and a sub-program for authenticating a users computer.

The patent holding company claims Apple has not patented its Fairplay technology and that for that reason it must be using its patent. "This is certainly a patentable technology," Pat-right president Peter Chung said in a prepared statement released in late February. "If iTunes does not patent it, there must be a very good reason for them not to do so- someone else has patented this."

The company is demanding 12% of gross sales from Apple's iTMS and is giving Apple 21 days to accept what Pat-rights is calling "a reasonable license fee." At that point on or around March 21st, Pat-rights intends on filing suit for copyright infringement against Apple.

If it decides to file suit against Apple, the company plans on seeking damages up to three times its original value. The company has yet to determine a resonable value.

Recent Headlines - Updated May 2nd

Mon,12:40 PM
Three Ways to Protect your Apple Watch (and One Way Not To)
Mon,6:42 PM
TMO’s Guide to Buying Discounted iTunes Cards
5:45 PM
Comcast Talks About Terabyte Data Caps & More
5:12 PM
Bob LeVitus Will Present at SMMUG in Colorado Springs on May 9th
4:27 PM
Blumoo Bluetooth Universal Remote: $52.99
4:18 PM
iPhone Controlled Air Conditioner Looks, and is, Cool
3:00 PM
TMO Background Mode: Interview With Intel Fellow Dr. Bruce Horn
1:55 PM
TMO Daily Observations 2016-05-02: Apple’s Next Big Thing, Icahn’s $AAPL Selloff
10:53 AM
FBI Shows Fingerprints and Touch ID Aren’t Warrant-proof
Sun,12:15 PM
MGG 603: Pronunciation, Rants and The Joy of a Smaller Phone
Fri,6:10 PM
An Open Letter to Phil Schiller about iPhones, iPads, and Macs
5:30 PM
New Products Apple Might Give Us While We Wait for the Car
  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!