If you ask ChatGPT to write a story that sounds like Stephen King, you will no longer get what you requested. Users recently noticed that the popular chatbot is now blocking direct requests to copy the distinct voices of specific writers. This new rule applies to both living and dead authors, marking a major shift in how the tool works for creative projects.
The system offers to write with broad traits instead
Instead of flat out saying no, ChatGPT tries to offer a middle ground. When testers asked the AI to mimic Agatha Christie or Charles Dickens, it politely declined. The bot explained that it could not imitate their unique voices directly.
Don’t miss the best of The Mac Observer
Set us as a preferred source and our Apple reporting ranks higher in your Google Search results and Discover feed — one tap, no account changes.
However, it did offer to write an original piece that captures a similar mood. For example, it might offer to write a mystery with small-town dread, rather than copying a specific author. This means users can still get the general feeling they want, just without the direct imitation of a famous name.
Legal battles likely pushed the company to make this change
This sudden shift did not happen by accident. The creator of the tool, OpenAI, is currently fighting several massive lawsuits. Authors have accused the firm of training its artificial intelligence models on their copyrighted books without asking for permission or paying them.
By stopping the bot from directly cloning a writer’s style, the company might be trying to protect itself in court. While copyright laws usually protect specific words rather than a general writing style, a machine that can perfectly copy a writer on command looks very bad in front of a judge.
This new block helps the company argue that its tools are meant to inspire creativity, not just function as massive copying machines.
Discussion