Net Neutrality Fight Heads to Federal Appeals Court in San Francisco

1 minute read
| News

The fight to reverse the Federal Communications Commission’s changes that end net neutrality protection is headed to the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court in San Francisco.

Protesters marching to protect net neutrality

The legal fight to protect net neutrality is headed to the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court

So far, 22 challenges to the FCC’s anti-net neutrality rules have been filed. Opposition to the Restoring Internet Freedom order includes state Attorneys General, California’s Public Utilities Commission, internet companies, and public interest groups, according to Reuters.

Net Neutrality was essentially codified in 2015 when the FCC reclassified Internet Service Providers as utilities. That change let the FCC regulate internet services and impose rules that prevent providers from throttling or blocking content passing through their networks.

Net neutrality is the idea that all data should pass freely and unfettered between content providers, online services, and users. Netflix dealt with the exact opposite of this a few years ago when Comcast and Verizon throttled its video streams to viewers until the company agreed to pay extra money. Once Netflix agreed to the deal, problems with its video streams stalling or dropping out went away.

Without net neutrality rules, ISPs are free to charge companies to get their content delivered to users, block or manipulate online search results, and slow down or block content that competes with their own services.

Ajit Pai Hates Net Neutrality

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai has openly opposed net neutrality controls ever since they were enacted, and when he was appointed to his position vowed to undo his predecessor’s work. His Restoring Internet Freedom order was filed with the Federal Register on February 22nd, opening the door for the inevitable lawsuits.

Now that the lawsuits contesting the order are coming in the U.S. Judicial Panel is funneling them into the Ninth Circuit Court in San Francisco. Those lawsuits, coupled with the still needed approval from the White House Office of Management and Budget for some aspects of the order, will keep ISPs from abandoning net neutrality for now.

Even if the FCC’s net neutrality reversal stands, there’s still a chance a free and open internet in the U.S. will live on. Federal law makers are discussing the possibility of new legislation to protect net neutrality, and some states are working on laws requiring ISPs to honor net neutrality.

For now, that means Ajit Pai is close to killing net neutrality in the U.S., but he hasn’t accomplished his goal yet.

3
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
3 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
jhorvaticgGrantJustCause Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Member
jhorvatic

JustCause is right. He loves all the money he will get for killing it. And the internet providers will love all the money that they will be able to screw Americans out of by killing it.

gGrant
Member
gGrant

Watch the language of any net neutrality legislation. The cable companies’ big out in the previous short lived approach was the wording ‘legal content’ – missed by most commentators and a ticking time bomb that didn’t get to go off. Torrents, obviously illegal, banned. Plex and other sharing, gone. Hate speech soon becomes any speech I don’t agree with because it triggers me. Encrypted communications, sorry passed a law that made them illegal. It doesn’t take much imagination to find a way to take control of everything on the internet with those two words ‘legal content’. Like the Dreamers/mental health… Read more »

JustCause
Member
JustCause

Hates net neutrality? Or is it more likely he loves all the money that he gets for killing it?