Should Apple Make an Android iMessage App?

1 minute read
| News

Writing for Macworld, Jared Newman thinks it’s high time for Apple to make an Android iMessage app. Pundits have been calling on Apple for years to do this, but is it the right move?

[iOS: How to Send Links in iMessage Without the Rich Preview]

iMessage for Android

Jared lays out three reasons why Apple should do this:

  • It’s good for Apple customers
  • It’s good for the Apple brand
  • It’s good for Apple’s business

I agree with Jared, and I think Apple should make an iMessage app for Android. It would be good for everyone I think, Apple and Android users included. This would effectively be the death of the green bubble, because Android users would have access to the same group chats, stickers, read receipts, etc.

Green bubbles versus blue bubbles in iMessage. Should Apple make an Android iMessage app.

Left: Android user. Right: iPhone user.

And most importantly, Android users would have the same end-to-end encrypted communication that iPhone users have. That’s where my question comes in. If Apple did this, I wonder if the government would come down harder on Apple when it comes to encryption.

I think iMessage on Android would instantly kill Google’s offerings, because let’s face it, they’re a joke. Google and Android manufacturers probably wouldn’t make iMessage the default app and have it baked into Android. But Android users would quickly download it and make it their default.

With iMessage end-to-end encryption, governments and ISPs could no longer snoop on our messages for advertising purposes or surveillance. And they won’t like that. But we’re in a time now that more and more people are becoming more aware of their privacy, and Apple could come to the rescue with an Android iMessage app.

[Fun with iMessage in iOS 11]

6 Comments Add a comment

  1. Valdo

    Do whatewer you want Apple, but give me the possibility to delete iMessage from macOS and dissable daily login popup messages to sign in to iMessage. And I would like to have the possibilty to delete also other Mac useless apps.

    On iOS please remove FaceTime warnings, I deleted FaceTime for more then a year, but I get payment warnings on daily basis.

    What a mess sounds like conceived in California developed in Russia!

  2. techrules

    Never happen in a million years. I now have a Pixel 2 XL and still also carry an iPhone specifically for iMessages.

    There are many like me.

  3. jackadoodle

    Messages serves two purposes:
    1.) prevent Apple from being a slave to another message system
    2.) provide an incentive to stay in Apple ecosystem

    1 isn’t affected if they make an Android version, but 2 would be. I don’t see why they would do it

  4. wab95

    Andrew et al:

    I think that @jackadoodle has a point. A counter to it, however, is not only iTunes, a substantially deeper gravity well into the Apple ecosystem, but the lesson learnt from MS over their much coveted productivity suite, Office, which Nadella wisely made available to iOS with as much functionality as possible, to the benefit of MS’s coffers. In the for-profit business, profit will always be a major driver.

    Two things that militate against that line of reasoning for iMessage, insofar as my layman’s understanding allows, include:

    1) iMessage is not a money maker, nor is there, insofar as I know, a profit model underlying the product. This lack of a monetary incentive is not a deal breaker, however this next item might be.

    2) End to end encryption. Without getting into the weeds, my understanding is that the end to end encryption from iMessage is something that only your device, in this case, your iPhone’s hardware, can read. Before it leaves your device, it’s encrypted into code that only your device knows how to decrypt. Each iMessage is encrypted for a specific device. When you receive a message, it’s encrypted specifically for your device. (Techcrunch has a great rundown on this https://techcrunch.com/2014/02/27/apple-explains-exactly-how-secure-imessage-really-is/). I don’t know if the hardware underlying Android devices have the same functionality, not to mention that there is no one standard for Android hardware. Would most be capable of preserving end to end encryption, such that the Android messages are equally private? I don’t know. Indeed, for some Android OEM’s intelligence communities are expressing concern about pre-loaded state-sponsored ‘spyware’. Apple may simply see this as an unacceptable, if not simply unnecessary risk.

    If anyone has knowledge about #2 above, I’d be keen to hear.

  5. wab95

    I should add, another disincentive could be Apple’s business in certain nation states that are already unhappy with Apple’s end to end hardware encryption of iMessage.

    As part of their business plan for those states, they have been permitted to retain the product for their own devices, but have agreed not to disseminate it to non-Apple devices. A small victory for Apple, but at a negotiated price. This would not surprise me, if so.

Add a Comment

Log in to comment (TMO, Twitter, Facebook) or Register for a TMO Account