[quote author=“capablanca”]Leopard will have a much bigger financial impact than I previously thought. I qualify my comments by stating that my copy of Leopard does not arrive until next Wednesday. But I just received a two hour briefing from a trusted source.
One example of what I mean. iChat is going to sell Macs. Yes iChat. When coupled with Screen Sharing and Back to my Mac, Leopard delivers a new very easy to use communication tool. Employees of a company, scattered around the globe can use this tool for collaboration; one person can get tech support from another with this tool; a salesman can make a remote presentataion with it. Each of these can of course be done now, without Leopard, if you are Steve Wozniak. But the genius of Leopard is it makes it possible for ordinary shoe-clerks to deploy these labor saving, efficiency delivering tools.
Forget the lower cost of ownership, forget the freedom from attacks, forget the better reliability. The reason to deploy Macs in your company is your people will get more work done.
The main problem is how to get Macs into the corporations. If you’re the president of a small business, then it’s not a problem. However, in large corporations, the IT guys are gonna hate the idea that a lot of their jobs are going to be on the line if the Macs don’t require their services as much.
Do you think that larger corporations are just going to dump their PCs and bring in thousands of Macs. I’d really enjoy seeing the New World Order of Macs.
I sure wish it would be done, but do you think it’s likely to happen? I don’t know how corporate purchases take place. I always imagined there’s some sort of kickbacks or favors that get contracts and not necessarily purchasing the best computers. Even if that isn’t true, there’s still the problem of competing with Dell which is willing to undercut to razor thin margins just to move hardware.
It’s not the case that the office staff that uses the computers have any input to choose what they would like to use.